A leading business law firm in Denver, Colorado

3 Key Deal Structure Elements When Selling to Private Equity Buyers

Private Equity Buyers

Private equity (PE) firms have many ways of structuring a merger or acquisition deal to entice sellers to get to “yes” in the sale of their business. Each of these structural elements will have a real and significant impact on the actual purchase price a seller will walk away with as well as their rights and obligations post-closing.

It’s therefore critical for sellers to closely analyze and understand how structure affects deal outcome from the get-go with any prospective PE acquirer. In this article, we dive into three key structural elements that every selling owner should know in the context of the overall deal calculus so that they can make the best decisions with respect to whether they are truly getting the deal they want in a company sale to PE.

For purposes of this article, we assume that the seller has already established an enterprise valuation for their business. It’s advisable that sellers engage an experienced and knowledgeable investment banker or M&A valuation specialist to assist in the development and negotiation of an accurate valuation on which a purchase price for the business can be based. 

1.   Payment Structure.

In today’s M&A environment, the payment structure for an M&A sale to PE will almost always consist of some portion of cash and some portion of a deferred and/or contingent payment whether by earnout, rollover equity, or promissory note (or some combination thereof).

Too often, sellers bullish on the future prospects for their business and the buyer’s financial wherewithal post-closing view deferred or contingent consideration as almost guaranteed, but the reality is that payment of most deferred or contingent consideration is rarely, if ever, guaranteed and is in fact at risk.

The degree to which a deferred or contingent payment is at risk varies depending on the specific structure and requirements agreed to by the parties, and so sellers should look very closely at the terms and conditions placed by the PE buyer around payment of these amounts.

Earnouts

In an earnout arrangement, the buyer agrees to pay the seller a portion of the purchase price upon achievement of specific post-M&A financial milestones or objectives. Our previous article provides a deeper discussion of M&A earnouts, where we touch on common risks to sellers with respect to earnouts, such as prolonged attachment to the acquired company, inability to control achievement of the milestones or financial targets, and the inherent difficulty of calculating the earnout amount.

One component of the earnout that many sellers and their advisors may overlook at the letter of intent stage and in the purchase agreement is the subordination of the earnout to the payment of the acquired company’s senior debt.

PE buyers will often require that the acquired company incur substantial debt in the form of a line of credit and other loans in order to finance the PE acquirer’s purchase of the business, as well as for the acquired company’s working capital post-closing.

The PE buyer and its lender may then require that the earnout payment be subordinated to the senior debt, meaning that the PE buyer will be prohibited from paying the seller the earnout if the buyer / acquired company is in default to its senior lenders, which can create significant problems for sellers who have earned the payment but are then told they can’t be paid because of the acquired entity’s noncompliance with a financial covenant under their senior loan agreements (and the seller will have no control over these senior loan covenants).

In addition, if there will be an earnout, aside from the subordination issue, it is important to obtain a guarantee either directly from the PE fund or another affiliated entity of the PE that has the financial money to ensure there is an independent source of the backstop to pay the earnout if is achieved. Without this, if the PE buyer defaults on paying the earnout, sellers may find they are seeking recovery from an entity with no assets, making it impossible to recover on those amounts.

Seller Rollover Equity Consideration

More and more PE buyers are requiring that sellers “rollover” a portion of the purchase price into equity of the acquired company (or an affiliate of the buyer, such as one of its PE funds). We covered rollover structures in M&A deals in a previous article.

As much as 20% (and usually at least 10%) of the purchase price can be required to be rolled over. Some of the more important components of rollover equity structures for sellers to consider include:

  • Ensuring the rollover equity is the same class as the equity acquired by the PE buyer.
  • Limiting the triggers for a premature buyout or forfeiture of the seller’s rollover equity, such as upon the selling owner’s separation of service without cause. The goal is to allow the seller to hold the rollover equity until the exit event on the same terms as the PE investor given that the rollover equity is in effect just like a cash investment by the selling owner (in contrast to it being a cash-free grant in exchange for services to the company such as one would expect to see with key employees who receive equity but didn’t roll potentially millions of dollars of their sale proceeds as selling founders often do as part of sales to PE buyers).
  • Limiting the percentage or amount of payments, such as excessive management fees, to the PE firm that may unduly reduce the amount realizable to the founders as it pertains to their rollover equity.
  • Implementing come-along (sometimes called “tag-along”) rights in the event of both full and partial exits to provide the selling owner with the same rights to sell their equity in the event the PE buyer decides to sell some or all of its equity to a third-party.
  • Using preemptive rights, which allow the selling owners to maintain their pro rata share of their equity should the acquired company issue new equity (such as to the PE investors or their affiliates) or anti-dilution measures to address the potential for dilution of the selling owners’ rollover without their consent.

2.   Employment Agreements for Sellers.

Selling owners typically continue in management employee capacities after the closing. Therefore, employment terms (often detailed employment agreements) will be expected and important for PE buyers and sellers.

Any employment agreement should address the salary, term, authority, benefits, bonus potential, and severance (if triggered upon a termination without cause) of the selling owners. For more information on post-closing considerations for sellers, see our prior article covering these items.

Sellers need to negotiate appropriate terms like severance upon termination of their employment “without cause” or for “good reason” (not forgetting to also negotiate the meanings of these terms, which can differ dramatically from deal to deal).

PE buyers routinely endeavor to negotiate repurchase rights on the rollover equity of sellers in the event of their termination for any reason—typically on less-than-optimal terms. For instance, there could be a payout at a price determined by the management board of the PE buyer which is payable over a period of several years with no collateral.

Sellers should push back on this to ensure they maintain their rollover equity until there is a subsequent exit event by the target. At a minimum, sellers should insist any such repurchase rights would exist only on a “cause” termination (illuminating the importance of having an appropriate “cause” definition that is not open-ended or vague and is attached to an event unlikely to occur, such as fraud on the part of the seller).

See one of our previous articles here that utilized a prominent public figure to analyze the importance and impact of “cause” and “no cause” separations and the financial ramifications associated with those distinctions (and which also includes important tips when it comes to negotiating the terms of executive employment agreements).

3.   Equity Incentive Plans for Key Employees.

In PE deals, both the buyer and seller will want to incentivize key personnel of the acquired company to stay on post-sale. Profits interests are common incentives that help align the interests of a private equity buyer and employees of the target company. Other equity incentive plans include stock options, restricted stock, or bonus pools. These incentive plans are not just for key employees other than founders. In most cases, the selling founders are also eligible to participate in them.

Conclusion.

Payment structure, employment agreements, and equity incentive plans for key personnel are critical elements in any M&A sale to a PE acquirer. At Linden Law Partners, we have represented numerous sellers in all aspects of once-in-a-lifetime sale events to PE firms, including for the development and negotiation of the key elements outlined in this article. Contact us today to discuss how we can help.

Selling Your Company: 3 Key Deal Advocacies You Need

You’ve heard it before: when you’re ready to sell your company, your very first step should be to hire a team of seasoned deal professionals. But why? What, exactly, should you expect from your deal team? In a word: advocacy. A professional boxer would not step into the ring without a team to coach and keep him on his feet from start to finish, and neither should you. From taking your company to market through reviewing offers, due diligence, negotiations, definitive agreements and closing, your deal team will champion your cause by providing valuation, contract, and strategic advocacy.

3 Key Deal Advocacies You Need for Selling Your Company:

Getting your deal team on board from the beginning is critical to help you avoid building a deal on a shaky foundation, such as a weak valuation or contract terms that are not favorable to you. It’s very difficult (if not impossible) to walk back something you neglected to deal with in your conversations with prospective buyers early in the process.

1. Valuation Advocacy.

Sophisticated deal advisors will begin by taking a cold, hard look at your business to assess its readiness for market. This is not the time to have advisors tell you what you want to hear. Are the right systems and management team in place? Are sales moving in the right direction, and supported by a strong marketing plan? Are the numbers favorable and defendable?

AdvocacyEarly on, your deal team will work to position your company to garner the highest possible valuation. The level of interest in the market will determine the value of your company, typically based on a multiple of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). Your investment banker will advise you on multiples typical in your industry and will present prospective buyers with an adjusted EBITDA portraying the most profitable picture.

Expect to answer endless questions while your financial and accounting representatives scrub your financials. They need to know, before a potential buyer moves into the picture and commences due diligence, where any skeletons are hidden. They may add back one-time or owner’s expenditures. An above-market owner compensation package? Addback. That all-expense-paid company retreat in Jackson Hole? Health and country club memberships? Addbacks.

The resulting “base case” presents buyers with a reasonable run-rate for the company post-acquisition, and your deal team will backstop the position with an “upside case” to demonstrate the enhanced profitability the buyer may expect with growth and synergies. 

Buyers frequently request a Q of E (quality of earnings) assessment performed by an unbiased third party. Having gone through the adjusted EBITDA “dress rehearsal”, you and your accounting team will be prepared to deal with the rigor of this analysis of income and earnings.

The last thing you want to do is weaken your negotiating position by damaging your credibility with a potential buyer. Nothing scares off potential buyers faster than sloppy financials or questionable accounting practices.

You should also understand that valuation is not just simple math, and that the highest-priced offer is not necessarily the best one! In a competitive sale process, an interested buyer may be forced to offer a market-rate multiple but do so in such a way as to preserve their cash at closing and protect their potential downside (should the company not perform as expected).

This means you can often expect prospective buyers to include earnouts, rollover equity, and other financing options as part of their valuation and offer. Buyers want to buy low, you want to sell high, and these financing options are commonly used to bridge the gap. Through the offer and negotiation stages, your deal team will work to maximize cash to you at closing by negotiating to minimize the impact of these delayed and conditional payments. After all, as we say in the deal business, “Cash is King.”

2. Contract Advocacy.

Expect your deal attorneys to continually interface and negotiate with scores of sophisticated M&A attorneys that leave no stone unturned looking not after your interests, but rather the buyers’ desire to make more money for themselves in the deal. There will be numerous interrelated variables to consider, negotiate, and manage.

Look to your deal professionals to translate the numbers, help you to understand every nuance, and draft your desires into the letter of intent and definitive agreements. This process takes extraordinary attention to detail and significant expertise with complex contracts. 

Most deals have a contingent piece in the equation when it comes to a portion of the purchase price. Even all-cash deals invariably have an escrow holdback, where a portion of the price is held in an escrow account as insurance for the buyer.

Wouldn’t a $50 million cash at closing offer be more attractive to you than a $50 million all-cash offer that requires a 20% ($10 million) holdback to protect against working capital adjustments or undisclosed liabilities for an extended post-closing period? Although it’s likely in just about any sale deal that some portion of the closing proceeds will be escrowed, an M&A expert will know if you’re being asked for too much to be held back and/or for a time period that is too long.

An experienced M&A attorney will also have access to market studies and experience to advocate for market (or better than market) terms for you on these elements. Similarly, the representations, warranties and indemnities included in your definitive agreements can lead to price erosion and should be in line with what’s market for similarly situated deals. (You may not be familiar with what’s market for these items, but a specialized M&A attorney will be). 

Additional layers of complexity come into play with the interrelations between the purchase or merger agreement and the numerous other complex agreements required to fully memorialize a deal. For instance, implications of each of the following (among many other key contractual provisions) must be seamlessly woven into the definitive agreements: 

You need contract experts to run interference, identify what’s critical and what’s not, translate it for you, and then negotiate it, get it, write it, and ensure it stays in the contract through signing and closing. The cold, hard truth is that all the terms of your deal will be included in the contract and your deal gets done exactly according to the contract. All those tantalizing valuation figures discussed between principals are ultimately meaningless if they’re not properly reflected in the contract. Reality.

3. Strategic Advocacy.

Valuation and contract advocacy require consistent, coordinated strategic planning as well as negotiations involving you, your deal team, the buyer and the buyer’s representatives. Your team needs to always be aligned and repeatedly realigned. Each of you must know who is talking to whom on the other side, and you must continuously coordinate your messaging and negotiation strategy.

It’s essential that your buyer constantly hears the same message from each of you, with no chinks in the armor. The many variables, negotiations, and staying in tune with your team inevitably takes a toll, and you will need allies in your corner. Expect them to recommend where to push back, where to concede, and remind you, when the going gets tough, that hard conversations are part of making deals.

Your deal team should keep you strong, focused and on task when the deal gets muddied – as it will. A key strength of a seasoned deal-professional is their ability to keep their eyes on the prize when the deal bogs down (as most do) in the innumerable details.

Expect your deal team to help you see beyond all the noise and disarray and keep your sights on stepping off the playing field victorious (which in practical terms for owners selling to sophisticated buyers can mean you got to the 50-yard line, i.e., you ended up with a deal that was fair).

We Can Be Your M&A Deal Advocates.

We are strong proponents of hiring deal experts to guide you through the complicated, lengthy, and all-important process of selling your business. At Linden Law Partners, we specialize in quarterbacking all aspects of M&A deals, and we have represented buyers and sellers in hundreds of M&A transactions.

While there are many common threads among the most successful transactions, we recognize the uniqueness and personal attention required for each deal. Contact us to discuss how we can help.

Protective Provisions in LLC Operating Agreements: Why They Matter

Introduction: Protective Provisions In LLC Operating Agreements

You came up with the right business idea, formally organized your LLC, are about to raise some seed money from friends and family, and you are ready to prepare the operating agreement for your company.  Or maybe you are a prospective investor, and you believe in the idea and team behind a business operated as an LLC that pitched you for a capital investment.

Whether you are a founder or investor, the protective provisions (sometimes referred to as “major decision” provisions) of an operating agreement are critical to consider, understand, and have appropriately drafted in the LLC operating agreement.

What Are Protective Provisions?

Generally, a designated manager (or board of managers, such as if there are multiple founders) is granted with the power and authority to decide, approve, and conduct the day-to-day decisions of an LLC. However, the “protective provisions” give rights to investors, whether through their representation as a manager on the board or through their voting rights as members in the LLC, to approve certain decisions of the company.

These approval rights are often critically important to the long-term success of the company and its investors. The protective provisions are often heavily negotiated by investors and founders. 

While the protective provisions for anyone operating agreement may be deal-specific, a list of typical ones that both founders and investors should evaluate includes:

  • An increase or decrease to the authorized amount of membership interests (or designation of differing classes of membership interests, particularly classes which are senior to or on parity with the class of interest held by investors); 
  • The redemption of previously issued membership interests (other than under equity incentive plans or employment agreements giving the company a repurchase right on discontinuation of services);
  • The company’s making of distributions (other than tax distributions); 
  • The company’s borrowing of money above a designated threshold amount;
  • The sale of the company or another other change of control transaction; 
  • An increase or decrease in the number of the company’s managers;
  • Changes to the annual budget above certain threshold amounts; 
  • The hiring of executive employees (and/or compensation levels above a designated threshold amount); and
  • The amendment of certain fundamental provisions of the operating agreement (such as distributions, allocations, and other similar provisions that were likely a fundamental basis for a member’s willingness to make an investment in the company). 

Why Do Protective Provisions Matter?

It is self-evident why protective provisions matter to investors in an LLC. Without them, the founders have unfettered ability to spend company money, and to otherwise make unilateral decisions for the company or themselves, that may have no relation to the overall interests of the investors and/or the protection or increase of the value of their investment.

What is sometimes less obvious is the impact of protective provisions on the interests of founders and their ability to operate the company in the manner they may feel most prudent to all constituents involved. For example, it is probably not a wise idea to give extensive protective provision rights to investors for a relatively small overall investment amount. Consider an instance where the total investment is $50,000.

In these cases, for an early-stage startup to need to obtain approval from investors on each major company decision can be impractical and overly time consuming, particularly where the investor is not involved day-to-day and is not truly in the same position as the founders to best assess the company’s needs and objectives.  

For more significant investments in LLCs, such as tried and true venture capital type investments (which do occur in LLCs more routinely than years past where companies were more frequently structured as C-Corporations), the likelihood is high that investors will demand board of manager representation rights and an extensive list of protective provisions.

In these cases, it puts emphasis on the need for founders and investors to be more intricately aligned on the company’s plans and objectives from the outset of the investment (such as a shared philosophy pre-investment on matters of strategy, budget, hiring, raising subsequent capital, and the eventual exit desires for the company).

Conclusion.

The protective provisions in LLC operating agreements can significantly impact the rights of both the founding members and investors. The appropriateness for various protective provisions often depends on the stage of the company and the overall size of the investment.

Regardless, founders and investors alike need to assess, understand, and appropriately draft protective provisions, which are often some of the most heavily negotiated and impactful elements of LLC operating agreements. The attorneys at Linden Law Partners have prepared and negotiated hundreds of LLC operating agreements for business owners and investors at all stages of the company’s business life cycle. Contact us today to discuss how we can help. 

© 2021 Linden Law Partners, LLC. All rights reserved.